What is "feeling"?

All kung fu is about learning to “feel” (not just wing chun).

Many people think that "feeling" or "sensitivity" means you "feel" what is happening and react to it by "doing a move", like "pak sao" and "lap sao" or "kwan sao".

I believe this is much too slow to work in a truly violent situation.
Violence is chaos.
I believe that real violence simply happens much too fast to know how to react to it.
If I’m not mistaken, it was Mike Tyson who said, "everybody's got a plan until they get hit."
People train as if they are going to know what to do if the guy does this or what to do if the guy does that.
People think that if they develop "feeling" or "sensitivity", they will know how to react when the time comes.

In my experience, reacting is just too slow.
Reaction will always be flawed.
I train to remain calm and maintain a singular, steady intent in the midst of violence.
I don't train how to react to violence, I train how to be unaffected by it.
I train how to ignore it.

If I am reacting to what I feel, by doing "kung fu moves", I am not doing kung fu, I am imitating kung fu.
Maybe we have to know what kung fu is supposed to look like so that we know if we are on the right path or the wrong path.
Maybe imitating kung fu movements is a step in learning it.
Maybe an important step.

But imitating kung fu is not the same thing as doing kung fu.
Doing “moves” can help us begin to learn feeling, at first.
After we get a sense of feeling, we can stop doing moves and allow our selves to be moved.
When I follow my feeling, new moves magically start to appear when they are appropriate.

To me, this is the single most important fact about learning to “feel”:

EVERY MOVE FEELS EXACTLY THE SAME.

There is only one feeling to be learned.
If I know what several moves feel like, I know what all moves feel like.
I can ignore the moves, the moves are a distraction from what's really important. I focus on the constant, singular feeling that is kung fu.
I stop focusing on which "move" to use and focus on maintaining the same correct "feeling" at all times.
My goal is to maintain that singular feeling, that singular state of feeling, at all times.

I project energy and intent correctly and wait for the correct movement to happen.
This way I can learn any move I need.

I have not learned the third wing chun form, but I have seen moves from the third form appear in my chisao, just from following the same feeling at all times.
These moves don't happen on purpose.
They just happen.

When the wrong move happens, it's not because I "did" the wrong move.
It's because I lost that feeling.
I lost that one, true feling that I want to keep at all times.
I lost my connection during a transition.
Either I got disconnected, or I got stuck.

When the feeling is correct, I am relaxed and projecting energy outwards at all times.
My body is equally connected to the ground under my feet and to the ground under my partner’s feet, becoming a bridge.

I don't "make" a bridge.

I am the bridge.

So long as I maintain this feeling, projection and connection at all times, the correct moves just appear spontaneously, I don't have to "do" moves.
I just watch them happen.

It has taken me tremendous faith and diligence to learn kung fu this way, but the more I train this way, the more it works for me.
When it does work for me it is very, very powerful.

It is also one of the most addictive, blissful and pleasurable feelings in the world, when I can achieve it.
It is not at all strenuous.
It is effortlessness.
I don't have to struggle, I don't have to "try".
I feel relaxed and at peace in the midst of violence.

I believe this to be the true way of all traditional, non-sport martial arts, like Filipino Kali, Indonesian silat, taijiquan, Okinawan karate, etc…

Feeling is feeling, projecting energy is projecting energy, and connecting your center of mass to another person's center of mass is the same, regardless of stance or style.

This is what I try to feel every time I practice chisao.
Is there anybody else who has felt this?
Isn't there anybody else who wants to feel this?

STEVEN COLBERT ENDORSES OBAMA

http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/189700/october-29-2008/the-word---i-endorse-barack-obama

"Spiders On Drugs"

Spiders On Drugs In 1965 Dr. Peter Witt gave drugs to spiders and observed their effects on web building. This short film about the results of the experiment was created by First Church Of Christ, Filmmaker.
© 2008 YouTube, LLC

"WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO BE A GOOD MARTIAL ARTIST?"

In a nutshell, there are two kinds of martial arts:


The first kind includes styles that rely on physical strength, speed, power, and endurance, such as TKD, boxing, Kickboxing, Judo, BJJ, Kyokushinkai, etc. These styles are much better for physical conditioning, because they rely on physical conditioning as much as technique, and they all train their techniques against resistive, non-cooperative opponents.


To be good in these styles, it takes 3 things:

1. Lots of practice,

2. Lots of physical conditioning, and

3. Knowing how to cut weight for tournaments.

The second kind includes older, more traditional martial art styles that are designed to overcome your physical limitations:

They are designed to overcome an opponent who is more powerful, faster, and more aggressive than you are. That sounds like a more impressive goal than the first category above, but the truth most learners never actually succeed in that goal.


It's not the kung fu that is deficient, mind you, it's the people who teach and practice them that are unsuccessful. These styles are often passed on without really being put to any kind of reality test. Somebody pays their tuition for a number of years, gets "certified" to teach, they learn all the moves and all of the forms but they never actually aquire the skill. Just because somebody has an "X" degree black belt and the trained under "(Insert name of famous master here)", doesn't mean they can teach you to overcome an opponent who is stronger and more aggressive than you are.


Many instructors in "traditional" styles still rely on being stronger, faster, and more aggressive than their students, and don't "pressure test" their techniques enough. The result is students who rely on being stronger, or faster, or more aggressive than their practice partner, or students who can't really do anything because they're not physically powerful and they have no technique.


To be good at traditional martial arts requires that you:


1. Find someone to learn from who actually himself actually has skills.

Instructor certificates and black belts are no proof. Exercise your own discernment.


2. Never stop searching.

Just because you found a teacher doesn't mean you've found the teacher. Always have your radar on when you here about new teachers, schools, or styles of martial art. Read and research about other martial arts. If you train taichi, what can you learn from boxing or judo or TKD. If you train Okinawan karate, what can you learn from taichi or Filipino Kali? I like to say that if it looks like Hung Gar kung fu, but it feel like Taichi, it's probably right.


3. Practice, practice, practice.

Training traditional martial arts involves a transformation of who you are. That requires hours and days and weeks and years of time spent in training, both with and without a partner.


4. Very important: PRACTICE WITH CORRECT INTENT.

If you try to "win", but you rely on using greater strength or greater speed or being more aggressive to win, you'll never learn how to beat someone who is stronger or faster or more aggresive than you are.


You can practice for 20 years and still have no real kung fu skill unless you train with correct intent. Kung fu should feel effortless. That means hanging back and watching it happen without "trying". "Trying" too hard means you are not using correct technique.

Practicing doesn't always mean trying to win! "Practice" is a safe environment for trial and error. Have the courage to make your mistakes without tensing up. Have the courage to lose on purpose. Be wrong the right way, lose while maintaining correct intent. Have the courage to watch your mistakes happen, instead of trying to compete.

5. Also very important: Be very, very honest with yourself.

YOU CANT'T LEARN KUNG FU IF YOU THINK YOU ALREADY KNOW IT!

If you want to improve your current level, you must, must, must decide to face your flaws and haul them out into the open for yourself and everybody else to see. That means making a conscious decision to learn instead of win.


You don't "know" kung fu after learning a number of moves and a number of forms and training for a number of years. You "know" kung fu when it happens naturally and easily, without effort, without "trying", under great pressure. If you have to "try", it means the reality is you that you don't "know" kung fu yet, but you're "trying" to hide that reality from yourself.

I have been practicing kung fu for ten years, and I the only reason that I have learned as much as I have is because I know that I do not know kung fu yet. I am finally feeling many of the missing pieces fall into place, my kung fu is working for me in a way that is more powerful and beautiful than anything I have experienced before, but I still have flaws, I can be beat, and if I want to discover my flaws and attain I higher level, I need to have the discipline to allow myself to be lose when I am even a little bit wrong. I cannot be concerned with ego or losing "face". I need to have the courage to be wrong the right way.

I have one classmate who is one of my best guides in this endeavor. He got there after only four years of training! I have come to understand that he got it and other people (like me) didn't because he gave up trying to win, and he learned how to win without trying.

He stopped trying to "look" the way he thought he was supposed to look. He learned to stay relaxed and focused while his partners "beat" him in chisao. He stopped trying to control his body and "make" things happen. He learned to "let" things happen. He didn't learn kung fu, his body did.

Above all else, learning kung fu requires you to keep searching until you find it. The Chinese word "kung-fu" is an action-result compound. "Gong" means "work" or "effort", and "fu" means "accomplishment" or "achievement". The compound word means "[visible]accomplishment as a result of [doing a great deal of] work". It takes a great deal of work to arrive at effortlessness. If somebody offers you an easy path, it's probably not a path that leads to truth.

When did martial arts originate?

For a while I was following the "Yahoo Answers" martial arts section (Yes, I was that bored). But it made me think about some stuff, and got my rusty pen (and brain) to slowly start moving again. Here is something I enjoyed writing:

Question:

During which dynasty did martial arts originate in?

My Answer:

Do you think the first cavemen to pick up a club and beat another caveman over the head with it never thought to practice with it? My guess is that cavemen figured out pretty quick swinging a club on your own a bit before going toe to toe with another low-brow helps to increase your survival of the fightest. Martial arts have been with us in some form as long as violence has.

As long as their have been weapons in the world, there have been ideas about how to teach the use of weapons – which is what martial arts are. So the first “martial artist” would have been the first caveman to swing a club, and would have evolved from there into the veritable plethora of dorky white guys dancing around in pajamas that we see today.

Martial arts, in China, India and elsewhere, have been around as long as war has been around. So a better question to be ask, and much easier to find truthful answers to based on archeological evidence is this (are these):

When, according to archeological, records were swords invented (India, China, elsewhere)?

Going back further in time (Pre-iron/bronze age):
When, according to archeological, records were spears invented (India, China, elsewhere)?

Going back even further in time (cro-magnon man, or possibly homo erectus or homo habilis):
When, according to archeological, records were clubs invented (India, China, elsewhere)?

Okay, I believe this question is asking more specifically, when (what dynasty) did martial arts originate in CHINA, and the simple answer is that modern martial arts originated long before the first Chinese “dynasty”. The relatively “modern” styles of fighting like Shaolin Kungfu and Taichi evolved very gradually from more primitive tribal arts, which probably resembled Filipino Kali. The tribal fighting arts evolved (in China) very slowly from the first (Chinese) caveman hitting another (Chinese) caveman with a club.

What do swords, spears and clubs have to with the evolution of empty-handed fighting styles (in China, anyway)? Everything. Empty-handed kungfu and fighting with weapons is fundamentally the same. You learn to fight with your hands and feet first. When you can do that real good, you pick up a sword or a spear or a big stick, and do the same stuff. The way you move, the way you use your body and interact with another body, is fundamentally the same. The feeling is the same.

People who trained martial arts 1000 years ago were training for war. They trained empty-handed, but they didn’t go to war empty-handed. They most important aspect of martial arts was preparing you for war, preparing you for the use of a weapon in life-or-death combat, not point-sparring or the UFC.

They started teaching beginners to fight empty-handed because they were less likely to lop off their own ear that way (or their teacher’s). Let ‘em get some skills before they handle anything long and sharp.

At what point in time (during which dynasty), did they decide to teach empty-handed fighting skills before learning weapons? Dunno, try Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kungfu

According to Chinese legends, martial arts were introduced by the “Yellow Emperor” Huang Di in 2698… Around the same time period, according to western legends, Eve was created from Adam’s rib and she caused humanity to fall from grace because she merely listened to some insipid serpent. Yada, yad, yada…

The wikipedia page on Chinese martial arts describes the earliest known records of martial arts activities as predating Lao Tzu and Confucius. It summarizes with this sentence:
“The modern concepts of wushu (Shaolin and similar styles) were fully developed by the Ming and Qing dynasties.”

I know that everybody has stories about Bodhidharma bringing martial arts to the Shaolin Temple from India during the early fifth century AD, but according to wikipedia:
“The oldest evidence of Shaolin participation in combat is a style from 728 CE… From the 8th to the 15th centuries, there are no extant documents that provide evidence of Shaolin participation in combat. However, between the 16th and 17th centuries there are at least forty extant sources which provided evidence that, not only did monks of Shaolin practice martial arts, but martial practice had become such an integral element of Shaolin monastic life that the monks felt the need to justify it by creating new Buddhist lore” [the Bodhidharma mythology]

"What dynasty did [shaolin] martial arts originate [in China]?”
War was not suddenly invented by the Emperor Huang Di in 2698.
As long as their have been human tribes going to war with other human tribes, their have been martial arts.

The sudden appearance of Kungfu in the Shaolin Monestaries, and extensive oral histories about Shaolin kung fu, coincides with the arrival of the Qing dynasty, an ethnically non-Chinese dynasty. The Qing dynasty was plagued from the start to finish (1644-1911) by revolutionary societies trying to build secret armies and overthrow the Manchu invaders and restore a Chinese emperor to the dragon throne. What better way to hide a secret army in plain sight than have them shave there heads and start telling stories about Buddhist monks peacefully training kung fu for spiritual cultivation.

Some other Q's and A's from "Yahoo Answers":


Question:

How would Batman do in the UFC?

My Answer:

Batman would lose many of his traditional advantages; the UFC rules would not allow him wear his utility belt in the octagonthere are no shadows for him to lurk in, either. And that cape of his could be used against him. Picture batman getting jerseyed, hockey-fight style, by Wolverine. He'd do okay against Aquaman on dry land, of course. He would obviously be able to take out the Green Lantern, seeing as how jewelry is not allowed in the ring, and Green Lantern's ring is the source of all of his power. However, though he's a highly motivated, resourceful and even talented fighter, he just wasn't born with the raw natural athletic ability of Superman. If it were a streetfight, Batman might be able to use krav maga or ninjitsu to take out Superman, but in a pro NHB fight, he doesn't stand a chance against Superman. Or even Wonder Woman, for that matter.

Source(s):
What little is left of my brain.

Question:

Is there anything wrong with a lesbian couple expecting a baby?

My Answer:

There is one thing wrong with a lesbian couple having a baby: I would be highly suspicious that one of the individuals involved has been unfaithful.

Source(s):
5th grade sex-ed booklet

Question:

What is the different between ninjutsu and other fighting styles (or other martial arts)??

My Answer:

Ninjutsu is a martial art that is practiced primarily by turtles and other cartoon characters. The majority of other styles are practiced by real, live B-movie actors.

Source(s):
TV guide

Question:

Who would win in a fight, Rocky or Chuck Norris?

My Answer:

That would entirely depend on who's writing the screenplay.

Question:

Can I become a Shaolin Monk in under 17 months?

My Answer:

Modern shaolin monks are civil servants like meter maids and postal workers. Why would you want to become a postal worker in Communist China?

Question:

(Judo) What defences can I use against poopie-jime? (I am not making this up)

My Answer:
Try Pampers-ma-te or Huggies-ushi-gari.